Proud Boys Leader Enrique Tarrio Handed 22-Year Prison Term For Jan. 6 Attack

Authored by Joseph M. Hanneman and Jackson Richman via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Henry “Enrique” Tarrio Jr., the Florida-based former chairman of the Proud Boys accused of being the mastermind of a seditious conspiracy to assault the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, was sentenced to 22 years in federal jail on Sept. 5 by U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly.

Mr. Tarrio, 39, of Miami, acquired the longest jail time period amongst all Jan. 6 defendants, eclipsing the earlier document of 18 years given to Oath Keepers founder (*6*) in May, and Mr. Tarrio’s co-defendant, Ethan Nordean, on Sept. 1.

Prosecution of Mr. Tarrio and his Proud Boys lieutenants included probably the most prolonged Jan. 6 legal trial—greater than 4 months—held within the E. Barrett Prettyman United States Courthouse in Washington, D.C.

Mr. Tarrio was the final of his trial group to be handed a sentence by Judge Kelly, an appointee of former President Donald J. Trump. Mr. Nordean was sentenced to 18 years, Joseph Biggs 17 years, Zachary Rehl 15 years, and Dominic Pezzola 10 years.

Federal prosecutors sought a 33-year prison term for Mr. Tarrio, described in court docket paperwork as a “naturally charismatic leader, a savvy propagandist, and the celebrity chairman of the national Proud Boys organization.” Prosecutors claimed he exhibited “pernicious, violence-oriented leadership.”

During a virtually four-hour sentencing listening to, protection attorneys mentioned 15 years can be a enough jail time period.

Mr. Tarrio expressed regret for Jan. 6, for letting down his grandfather and his household, and for not respecting regulation enforcement.

He requested the choose for leniency so he may return to society and switch away from “my selfish endeavors.” Mr. Tarrio mentioned the trial has humbled him and he not needs something to do with rallies or politics.

I am not a political zealot,” he mentioned.

Calling seditious conspiracy a “serious offense,” Judge Kelly mentioned Mr. Tarrio was the “ultimate leader” of the conspiracy who schemed to have authorities buildings taken over on Jan. 6. What occurred that day was a “disgrace,” the choose mentioned.

Although Mr. Tarrio was not bodily current in Washington on Jan. 6, Judge Kelly utilized a sentence enhancement for terrorism primarily based on the assault on Capitol fencing by Mr. Biggs and Mr. Nordean. Judge Kelly mentioned the seditious conspiracy made Mr. Tarrio complicit within the fence destruction and deserving of the terrorism enhancement.

On May 4, Mr. Tarrio was discovered responsible by a jury of seditious conspiracy, conspiracy to impede an official continuing, obstruction of an official continuing, conspiracy to make use of pressure, intimidation, or risk to forestall officers of the United States from discharging their duties, interference with regulation enforcement throughout civil dysfunction, and destruction of presidency property.

Mr. Tarrio was discovered not responsible of assaulting, resisting, or impeding sure officers. The jury couldn’t attain a verdict on two different counts.

Much just like the Oath Keepers placed on trial in 2022 and 2023, Mr. Tarrio was accused of plotting to thwart the “peaceful transfer of power” from President Donald J. Trump to Joseph Biden Jr.

Defense legal professional Sabino Jauregui rejected the concept his consumer is a terrorist.

“My client is no terrorist,” Mr. Jauregui mentioned, as an alternative describing Mr. Tarrio as a “misguided patriot.”

Assistant U.S. Attorney Conor Mulroe disagreed, describing Jan. 6 as a “calculated act of terrorism.”

Read extra here…


Source link

Related Articles

Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime